Overall nice improvements. I thought that your old one was good too. The editing seems a lot tighter. The graphics are and pacing seems a lot more refined. I like the fact that they emphasize the points that you are making. Leaving the section titles in the corner is a nice touch. It reinforces the points you are making without and lets the viewer know where they are in the argument. The music is nice but you need to turn down your audio channel a bit. I find it distracting and it's hard to hear Matt in a couple of places. I like it in there but, it needs to be a background element. During a few of the scenes with Matt there is a blur that happens when he enters the frame. I don't know if this was on purpose, but it does not seem like it. It would be nice if it were used as a narrative element when the sides of the argument were less clear but, if not I would lose it all together. Good job overall. In my opinion you won but I already don't like Starbucks.
1 comment:
Overall nice improvements. I thought that your old one was good too. The editing seems a lot tighter. The graphics are and pacing seems a lot more refined. I like the fact that they emphasize the points that you are making. Leaving the section titles in the corner is a nice touch. It reinforces the points you are making without and lets the viewer know where they are in the argument. The music is nice but you need to turn down your audio channel a bit. I find it distracting and it's hard to hear Matt in a couple of places. I like it in there but, it needs to be a background element. During a few of the scenes with Matt there is a blur that happens when he enters the frame. I don't know if this was on purpose, but it does not seem like it. It would be nice if it were used as a narrative element when the sides of the argument were less clear but, if not I would lose it all together. Good job overall. In my opinion you won but I already don't like Starbucks.
Post a Comment